In my previous post I identified three newspapers which published extended correspondence from their readers about reprisals during the Blitz — The Times, the Manchester Guardian and the Daily Mail — one of which provided its own analyses of all the letters it received — the Mail. To try and assess whether these newspapers might […]
After opinion polls, the rest of the evidence for public opinion on reprisals is more impressionistic. I’ve already noted the conclusions of those who have plumbed the Mass-Observation archives (and Tom Harrisson didn’t just plumb the archives, he ran Mass-Observation during the war), and as I haven’t done that myself I’ll let them stand. But
Let’s tackle the question of public opinion head on. Did the British people want reprisal bombing to be carried out against the German people? How can we tell? Can we even tell? If we wanted to gauge public opinion on a particular question today, we’d carry out an opinion poll. As luck would have it,
Shortly after the Blitz began in earnest, Conservative MP Victor Cazalet wrote to the editor of The Times to urge that the RAF carry out reprisals against German cities for the ‘indiscriminate bombing’ of London.1 ‘The attack on the civil population is a military weapon’, he argued. ‘Can we possibly afford to give Germany a
This photo appeared on the front page of the Sunday Express on 6 October 1940, a month into the Blitz. A caption explained, or rather asked: WHO PUT UP THIS POSTER? This mystery poster has appeared in the streets of London. It is about six feet high and ten or twelve feet across, and bears
I noted in a previous post that the debate about reprisal air raids during the First World War largely revolved around two questions: are reprisals moral? and are reprisals effective? The same was true in the Second World War. Taking the question of effectiveness, how this was answered by participants in the debate depended partly
But sometimes, it rhymes. The above map, accompanying an article entitled ‘BOMB THESE TEN TOWNS!’, was published on page 4 of the Daily Mirror on 29 August 1940. It rhymes with this map published in the Daily Mail twenty-three years before:
Previously, I identified a comparison between the reprisals debate in the First World War and the reprisals debate during the Blitz as something I could do that previous writers have not (except in passing, or implicitly). I won’t have time in my AAEH paper for a full-blown comparative approach, or for that matter time before
In my reprisals paper abstract, I said that It is often argued that there was little enthusiasm in Britain for reprisals against German cities in retaliation for the Blitz, unlike the First World War. This is a historiographical claim. If I don’t want to be accused of using weasel words or attacking strawmen, it’s one
I’m giving a talk at the XXII Biennial Conference of the Australasian Association for European History, being held in Perth this July. It’s a big conference with some big names (e.g. Omer Bartov, Richard Bosworth, John MacKenzie), and there’s an appropriately big theme: ‘War and Peace, Barbarism and Civilisation in Modern Europe and its Empires’.
