The remarkable flight to Scotland of Rudolf Hess still dominates the headlines today, though much more so in the Manchester Guardian (5) than in The Times, it must be said. More details are emerging. It now seems that Hess was trying to meet with one specific person, the Duke of Hamilton, whose seat is at […]
If there was a surprising absence of speculation yesterday about the reasons behind Hess’s flight to Britain, that omission has been handsomely rectified in today’s newspapers. The Times even goes so far as to declare in its headlines that Hess, ‘essentially an idealist’, was ‘disillusioned’ (4). Why? He is believed first to have become more
Today’s big story must have caused quite a bit of consternation to readers: it’s scarcely possible to credit it. Here is the full text of the statement issued by 10, Downing Street last night (as reproduced in The Times, 5):
Saturday night’s heavy air raid on London damaged some of its greatest buildings. Parliament were hit hard: the House of Commons is ‘wrecked’, in the words of the Manchester Guardian today; Westminster Abbey is ‘open to the sky’ (5), though its structure is still intact. Other historic buildings were hit too. From The Times (4):
The lead story in the Observer today is one of those not-yet-news stories: an ‘important pronouncement’ on ‘a more active policy’ from President Roosevelt is ‘expected’ (5) on Wednesday. The implication is that this will bring America closer to war one way or another, something ‘more than moral encouragement and material aid’ for Britain. But
Ten aircraft failed to return from Bomber Command’s operations over Germany on Thursday night. Those losses are quite small in relation to the number of British aircraft involved in the raids on Hamburg and Bremen, between three and four hundred, ‘certainly the largest number ever used in one night’ according to page 7 of the
A recent post at Ptak Science Books alerted me to the existence of page 363 of the Illustrated London News for 6 September 1913. Not that I was surprised by this in general terms, but I was unaware of what was on it: an artist’s impression of a both a flying aircraft carrier — which
I don’t usually do pathos for the sake of pathos, but while reading Juliet Gardiner’s The Blitz: The British Under Attack (London: Harper Press, 2010), 316, I came across an account of loss which I’ve read before, and which I still find as moving as I did the first time. The speaker is an elderly
Over the years, I’ve written a number of posts about various phantom airship scares (which I take here to mean things seen in the sky which weren’t actually there). There are many more I might do in future, pending access to good sources (and maybe I’ll even get around to writing something for publication!) but
The Battle of Los Angeles took place on the night of 24 February 1942. It was more of a ‘battle’ than a battle: only one side did any shooting, and it’s not at all clear that there was a second side. The defenders of Los Angeles thought there was: they claimed they were shooting at
