[Cross-posted at Revise and Dissent.] I’ve been reading Joseph Corn’s The Winged Gospel: America’s Romance with Aviation, 1900-1950, a classic study of airminded culture in the United States — which was very different to that in Britain. The “winged gospel” is the term used by Corn to describe an intense complex of hopes and expectations […]
I’ve written about connections between sport and war before. Here’s another which I came across just last night, so perfectly timed that I can’t resist posting it. It’s from a book written in October 1941 or so by the pseudonymous Auspex, who is talking here about the RAF’s sweeps over France that summer, which he
Italian Savoia-Marchetti SM.81 bomber over Spain, c. 1936, with Fiat CR.32 fighter escorts. Image source: Wikipedia. Exactly seventy years ago, in late November and early December 1936, Madrid was being bombed. The way Antony Beevor describes it, it was the first attempt at something like a knock-out blow: The nationialists’ failure to break through on
I’ve been reading Respectful Insolence for quite a while now, but I somehow missed Orac’s post critiquing Richard Dawkins’ comments on Arthur Harris and the bombing of civilians in the Second World War, and how the development of precision-guided munitions (“smart bombs”) reflects a change in the moral zeitgeist since then. Fortunately, Jonathan Dresner pointed
Bluebird at Daytona Beach, 1935. Image source: Florida Photographic Collection. Well, the title of this post is a lie — there’s only two mysteries that concern me here, and one isn’t particularly mysterious … Sir Malcolm Campbell was a world-famous British speed maniac (there’s no other word for it), setting many records on land and
Last month, I noted a parallel between certain pre- and post-Hiroshima nuclear warfare narratives. Here’s an even more common one, this time between the knock-out blow itself and nuclear warfare. Here’s the American astronomer Carl Sagan, from the final chapter (“Who speaks for Earth?”) of the 1980 companion book to his acclaimed television series, Cosmos:
[Cross-posted at Revise and Dissent.] In a comment to an earlier post, Jonathan Dresner quite legitimately took exception to my use of the term ‘interwar’ to refer to the period 1919-1939: From an Asian history perspective, the Japanese use of chemical weapons in China isn’t really “interwar,” as major combat operations began in late ’37
Between the wars, it was a commonplace that poison gas would be used in the next war, would be used in large quantities, and would probably be used against civilians. This was a natural enough assumption; after all, it was used liberally enough in the Great War, and it was widely assumed that science would
The front cover of Victor Lefebure’s Common Sense about Disarmament (London: Victor Gollancz, 1932); the artist’s name is Douglas L. Dick. (I also have a colour scan — the title is in red and the background is a cream tint — but it’s rather muddy and much less striking than the monochrome version above.) Note
Actually, as interwar visions of armageddon go, this is pretty mild. But it reminded me of the scene in Terminator 2: Judgement Day where Sarah Connor has a nightmare about the coming nuclear war, with a nuclear warhead exploding over a playground filled with children: He was lying on a hill-side. Below him there was
