Here are a couple of photos I used in my AHA talk last week:

This is a Lufthansa Ju 52/3m, one of the great airliners of the 1930s, at Croydon aerodrome, ca. 1936. Other operators included Swissair, Aeroflot, and British Airways (an ancestor of the current airline of the same name).

And this is a Ju 52/3m bomber variant over Spain, ca. 1936. Note the defensive machine guns, in the dorsal position and in the ‘dustbin’ below. The Luftwaffe used Auntie Jus as interim combat aircraft up til the invasion of Poland, and used them to destroy Guernica in 1937, though the ones above were actually in Nationalist service.
So the point of showing these was to illustrate the convertibility of airliners into bombers (though it’s cheating slightly as the Ju 52s in the second photo were in regular military service, not adapted quickly and covertly for military purposes, which was what was so worrying about convertibility).
I think the talk went ok, though I wish I’d written it out from scratch rather than trim down an existing paper: it was too formal and stilted. Actually, I’d already learned that lesson, but was pressed for time and this seemed like an easier way to go. One positive thing I noticed was that I had virtually no nerves beforehand, which means I’m getting better compared with a couple of years ago!
It was a really good conference, covering everything from the Aboriginal geography of early Sydney (by Grace Karskens) to the possible Australian inspiration for the Munich conference (by Christopher Waters). I got to meet Mike Cosgrave’s student from Cork, Jonathan Murphy, whose talk exposed the shabby British treatment of the Polish government-in-exile at the end of the Second World War. For the first and probably last time, I was able to work Frankie Goes to Hollywood into a post-talk question, when I asked Erin Idhe about how Hawkwind compared with other British pop-cultural evocations of nuclear apocalypse. I unfortunately didn’t manage to meet Melissa Bellanta. Neither did I meet polymath and Australian Living Treasure Barry Jones, but did at least get to hear him speak at a book launch with his characteristic erudition. But most of all, I was very happy that I got the chance to have a chat with Paul Nicholls, my former supervisor, and favouritist history lecturer ever (sadly retired!), after my talk.
Image sources: vliegmachines.net; Aviones de la Guerra Civil Española (a brilliant site if you want photos of Spanish Civil War aircraft).

This work, unless otherwise expressly stated, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 License. Terms and conditions beyond the scope of this license may be available at airminded.org.
Possibly-related posts:
-
Nice pics. Is there any chance that you might be able to find the time to write up this talk like the last one? (Facing Armageddon) – I thought that was excellent and would love to read this one too.
-
“So the point of showing these was to illustrate the convertibility of airliners into bombers…”
And, indeed, the convertibility of bombers back into airliners:
http://www.aviation-history.com/boeing/307.html
B-17 wings and tail, and B-29 pressurisation.
-
…but we won’t mention the truly appalling Lancastrian:
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Avro_Lancastrian_BOAC.jpg
-
Ah well, thanks anyway.
I look forward to my university’s library service being able to reach anything published by you, but sadly I’m not holding my breath.
-
Fair point Brett, and I didn’t see the quote about the ’straight-forward conversion’, which is obviously rubbish.
I was just in fact a bit taken by all that lovely shiny metal. On reflection (oh, a pun) it was a godawful looking aircraft, with the nose/cockpit perhaps its only redeeming feature.
-
Oh, and good take on BIA operating Junkers, BTW.
And as a final, random, Friday question: Are there no flying Sunderlands left?
-
That would be brilliant, if possible, but no worries if not. Thanks, and good luck with the acceptance!
-
There’s an airworthy Sunderland in Florida, at the Fantasy of Flight museum, though it has been civilianised as a Sandringham, and doesn’t fly very often.
CK, what have you got against the Lancastrian? -
Fair point, Ian. On reflection pretty graceful http://www.curbe.com/QVA/qva/images/avro_lancastrian_ii-2.jpg
-
But by all accounts rather uncomfortable, and not suited to economic airline service…
-
Seems a bit daft – I can’t see a B-17 being any more comfortable than a York. The problem with the Lancastrian was that it kept the Lanc fuselage, and as such was very cramped indeed, as well as having the wing box run through the middle.
-
I don’t think any sane person considered the Lancastrian to be an airliner, it filled a requirement for a stop-gap rapid aerial conveyance.
-
A B17 is _cooler_ than a York. Guns, etc. It speaks volumes, too, about your ability to tap into your allies’ logistical flow. Monty may have been no better than the class of 1918 tactically (itself a pretty high bar to clear) but he was streets ahead at showmanship and morale, and for the British Army in 1941 and after morale was very important if they were to win.
-
I prefer to think of it as a surfeit of erudition…

22 comments
Comments feed for this article
Trackback link: http://airminded.org/2008/07/19/some-tante-jus-and-a-conference-report/trackback/