<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Airminded</title>
	<atom:link href="http://airminded.org/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://airminded.org</link>
	<description>Airpower and British society, 1908-1941</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 15:05:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Houdini over Australia by David Vanderhoof</title>
		<link>http://airminded.org/2010/03/18/houdini-over-australia/comment-page-1/#comment-133998</link>
		<dc:creator>David Vanderhoof</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 15:05:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://airminded.org/?p=3733#comment-133998</guid>
		<description>Really good post!!  I look forward to reading the blog going forward.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really good post!!  I look forward to reading the blog going forward.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Self-help in an air raid by Neil Datson</title>
		<link>http://airminded.org/2010/03/15/self-help-in-an-air-raid/comment-page-1/#comment-133973</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil Datson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 08:35:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://airminded.org/?p=3695#comment-133973</guid>
		<description>Silly me!  Can&#039;t even read properly now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Silly me!  Can&#8217;t even read properly now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Acquisitions by Brett Holman</title>
		<link>http://airminded.org/2010/03/19/acquisitions-87/comment-page-1/#comment-133970</link>
		<dc:creator>Brett Holman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 08:13:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://airminded.org/?p=3746#comment-133970</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s what surprised me, since it seems to be often cited as an overview of, e.g., the bombing of Japan.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s what surprised me, since it seems to be often cited as an overview of, e.g., the bombing of Japan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Self-help in an air raid by Brett Holman</title>
		<link>http://airminded.org/2010/03/15/self-help-in-an-air-raid/comment-page-1/#comment-133969</link>
		<dc:creator>Brett Holman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 08:09:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://airminded.org/?p=3695#comment-133969</guid>
		<description>Mistake? What mistake? (Thanks!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mistake? What mistake? (Thanks!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Self-help in an air raid by Neil Datson</title>
		<link>http://airminded.org/2010/03/15/self-help-in-an-air-raid/comment-page-1/#comment-133967</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil Datson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 07:59:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://airminded.org/?p=3695#comment-133967</guid>
		<description>The Poplar school explanation seems a good one to me.

Incidentally Brett, can it be that: &#039;London wasn’t considered part of London until 1926.&#039;  Shome mishtake, shurely?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Poplar school explanation seems a good one to me.</p>
<p>Incidentally Brett, can it be that: &#8216;London wasn’t considered part of London until 1926.&#8217;  Shome mishtake, shurely?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Acquisitions by Jakob</title>
		<link>http://airminded.org/2010/03/19/acquisitions-87/comment-page-1/#comment-133869</link>
		<dc:creator>Jakob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 15:41:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://airminded.org/?p=3746#comment-133869</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve only flicked through the Pape in the library, but from what I recall it&#039;s more a PoliSci/IR approach than a history one - lots of formal models and regression and the like.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve only flicked through the Pape in the library, but from what I recall it&#8217;s more a PoliSci/IR approach than a history one &#8211; lots of formal models and regression and the like.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Self-help in an air raid by JDK</title>
		<link>http://airminded.org/2010/03/15/self-help-in-an-air-raid/comment-page-1/#comment-133863</link>
		<dc:creator>JDK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 11:37:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://airminded.org/?p=3695#comment-133863</guid>
		<description>Australia&#039;s Ambulance &#039;club&#039; seems a modern near-equivalent, with having to pay a fee for a &#039;membership&#039; to avoid the major cost if you need an ambulance.  (This was a surprising system having come from the UK&#039;s and being familiar with the NHS.)  

Currently it appears some US states are finding it hard to provide such levels of emergency service and I recall reading about (but can&#039;t find now, of course) charging for an aspect of an emergency call out. 

It&#039;s one of those areas where (even today) as a traveller you keep bumping into different systems the locals consider &#039;normal&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Australia&#8217;s Ambulance &#8216;club&#8217; seems a modern near-equivalent, with having to pay a fee for a &#8216;membership&#8217; to avoid the major cost if you need an ambulance.  (This was a surprising system having come from the UK&#8217;s and being familiar with the NHS.)  </p>
<p>Currently it appears some US states are finding it hard to provide such levels of emergency service and I recall reading about (but can&#8217;t find now, of course) charging for an aspect of an emergency call out. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s one of those areas where (even today) as a traveller you keep bumping into different systems the locals consider &#8216;normal&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Houdini over Australia by JDK</title>
		<link>http://airminded.org/2010/03/18/houdini-over-australia/comment-page-1/#comment-133858</link>
		<dc:creator>JDK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 10:41:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://airminded.org/?p=3733#comment-133858</guid>
		<description>Good question!  I don&#039;t know, as the replica is actually an airworthy one, and therefore has a number of variations that make flying it more viable, but less accurate.  it would be better being occasionally demonstrated, which is what it was built for.  (Privately, then donated.)  The original will be very delicate and as a century-old light wood and fabric structure, temperature and humidity would be significant (if normal) display issues.  Certainly suspending it hung behind glass in the museum&#039;s foyer (as the replica is, and shown on my blog - pluglet, as above!) would be A Bad Idea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good question!  I don&#8217;t know, as the replica is actually an airworthy one, and therefore has a number of variations that make flying it more viable, but less accurate.  it would be better being occasionally demonstrated, which is what it was built for.  (Privately, then donated.)  The original will be very delicate and as a century-old light wood and fabric structure, temperature and humidity would be significant (if normal) display issues.  Certainly suspending it hung behind glass in the museum&#8217;s foyer (as the replica is, and shown on my blog &#8211; pluglet, as above!) would be A Bad Idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The red balloon scare of 1940 by Brett Holman</title>
		<link>http://airminded.org/2010/02/12/the-red-balloon-scare-of-1940/comment-page-1/#comment-133853</link>
		<dc:creator>Brett Holman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 09:24:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://airminded.org/?p=3504#comment-133853</guid>
		<description>One of the Mass-Observation diarists in Simon Garfield&#039;s &lt;em&gt;We Are At War: The Diaries of Five Ordinary People in Extraordinary Times&lt;/em&gt; (London: Ebury Press, 2006) was an office worker in Glasgow and she reported on this rumour at length in her entry for 7 February 1940. It sheds some interesting light on the transmission and reception of stories like this so I&#039;ll reproduce it in full here:
&lt;blockquote&gt;This afternoon produced an unusual amount of war commentary. Mr Mitchell returned at 2.50 saying that Mr Moffat had told him that he had been told by the porter at Dunblane station this morning that the officials at Fife had told him to beware of what appear to be children&#039;s balloons. These balloons are full of poison gas. Anyone seeing one should refrain from touching it, but should call a policeman instead.

I said I thought the Germans would hesitate to use such a method, because the direction of the wind is west to east and we could so easily retaliate, and there was a risk that their own balloons would blow back on them. Mr Mitchell did not agree.

At 3 p.m. Miss Bousie returned from lunch saying that there were bills about saying &#039;Small balloons, don&#039;t touch&#039;. Miss Bousie wishes to know why the Government have not told us how to handle such a balloon. Should one put water on it? Mr Mitchell&#039;s advice was to call a policeman. She rejected this as there may be no policemen in the vicinity. Mr Mitchell said, &#039;Then just go on and forget about the balloon.&#039;

Miss Bousie: &#039;There may be people in the vicinity who could not know that it was dangerous. No. I would stand beside the balloon -- no matter how long I had to stand -- until a policeman happened to come that way. Go on and forget that it was there? Good gracious no! There was too much of that sort of thing in this world. People just thought of themselves.&#039;

I began to tell Mother that there was a wild rumour going about on the subject of balloons. She said she knew of it already for the BBC had issued an official denial at six. Mother&#039;s words were: &#039;This fool put a lighted cigarette against the balloon.&#039;

&#039;What fool?&#039; I said.

She said, &#039;In the factory where they were making the poison gas. There were a lot of balloons with gas in them and this fool went in with a cigarette which he had no business to be smoking and puts one up alongside a balloon, and it exploded. No damage was done.&#039;&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the Mass-Observation diarists in Simon Garfield&#8217;s <em>We Are At War: The Diaries of Five Ordinary People in Extraordinary Times</em> (London: Ebury Press, 2006) was an office worker in Glasgow and she reported on this rumour at length in her entry for 7 February 1940. It sheds some interesting light on the transmission and reception of stories like this so I&#8217;ll reproduce it in full here:</p>
<blockquote><p>This afternoon produced an unusual amount of war commentary. Mr Mitchell returned at 2.50 saying that Mr Moffat had told him that he had been told by the porter at Dunblane station this morning that the officials at Fife had told him to beware of what appear to be children&#8217;s balloons. These balloons are full of poison gas. Anyone seeing one should refrain from touching it, but should call a policeman instead.</p>
<p>I said I thought the Germans would hesitate to use such a method, because the direction of the wind is west to east and we could so easily retaliate, and there was a risk that their own balloons would blow back on them. Mr Mitchell did not agree.</p>
<p>At 3 p.m. Miss Bousie returned from lunch saying that there were bills about saying &#8216;Small balloons, don&#8217;t touch&#8217;. Miss Bousie wishes to know why the Government have not told us how to handle such a balloon. Should one put water on it? Mr Mitchell&#8217;s advice was to call a policeman. She rejected this as there may be no policemen in the vicinity. Mr Mitchell said, &#8216;Then just go on and forget about the balloon.&#8217;</p>
<p>Miss Bousie: &#8216;There may be people in the vicinity who could not know that it was dangerous. No. I would stand beside the balloon &#8212; no matter how long I had to stand &#8212; until a policeman happened to come that way. Go on and forget that it was there? Good gracious no! There was too much of that sort of thing in this world. People just thought of themselves.&#8217;</p>
<p>I began to tell Mother that there was a wild rumour going about on the subject of balloons. She said she knew of it already for the BBC had issued an official denial at six. Mother&#8217;s words were: &#8216;This fool put a lighted cigarette against the balloon.&#8217;</p>
<p>&#8216;What fool?&#8217; I said.</p>
<p>She said, &#8216;In the factory where they were making the poison gas. There were a lot of balloons with gas in them and this fool went in with a cigarette which he had no business to be smoking and puts one up alongside a balloon, and it exploded. No damage was done.&#8217;</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Houdini over Australia by Brett Holman</title>
		<link>http://airminded.org/2010/03/18/houdini-over-australia/comment-page-1/#comment-133851</link>
		<dc:creator>Brett Holman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 08:55:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://airminded.org/?p=3733#comment-133851</guid>
		<description>Dumb question, but why don&#039;t they put the original on display? And why didn&#039;t you plug your &lt;a href=&quot;http://vintageaeroplanewriter.blogspot.com/2010/03/austrian-american-in-frenh-aeroplane-in.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;own post&lt;/a&gt; on the Houdini flight? :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dumb question, but why don&#8217;t they put the original on display? And why didn&#8217;t you plug your <a href="http://vintageaeroplanewriter.blogspot.com/2010/03/austrian-american-in-frenh-aeroplane-in.html" rel="nofollow">own post</a> on the Houdini flight? :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
