Comments on: Runs on the board http://airminded.org/2009/11/02/runs-on-the-board/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=runs-on-the-board Airpower and British society, 1908-1941 Thu, 09 Feb 2012 19:09:12 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Gavin http://airminded.org/2009/11/02/runs-on-the-board/comment-page-1/#comment-118779 Gavin Sat, 07 Nov 2009 13:25:56 +0000 http://airminded.org/?p=2800#comment-118779 After acceptance I was allowed to do some minor revisions before the final deadline even though they weren't required. Then a few months later I had to proof read it and supply minor corrections (the deadline for proofs is about a month before publication). I was told it could be 18 months after acceptance before it got into print but I think they got me in a bit sooner because I'd had to wait an unusually long time for the first round of peer review. Overall it was about 2 years from first submission to publication, which I think is about average. After acceptance I was allowed to do some minor revisions before the final deadline even though they weren't required. Then a few months later I had to proof read it and supply minor corrections (the deadline for proofs is about a month before publication). I was told it could be 18 months after acceptance before it got into print but I think they got me in a bit sooner because I'd had to wait an unusually long time for the first round of peer review. Overall it was about 2 years from first submission to publication, which I think is about average.

]]> By: Ross Mahoney http://airminded.org/2009/11/02/runs-on-the-board/comment-page-1/#comment-118777 Ross Mahoney Sat, 07 Nov 2009 13:00:37 +0000 http://airminded.org/?p=2800#comment-118777 If it works anything like the chapter I did you should get a chance to see what chance the make/suggest. I found it a useful process and it was good to see the changes made and discuss why they were made. They are usually for the better. My conclusion was dumped mainly because it was more of a summary than anything else. If I am honest it is great to have another eye look at it before publication. If it works anything like the chapter I did you should get a chance to see what chance the make/suggest. I found it a useful process and it was good to see the changes made and discuss why they were made. They are usually for the better. My conclusion was dumped mainly because it was more of a summary than anything else. If I am honest it is great to have another eye look at it before publication.

]]> By: Brett Holman http://airminded.org/2009/11/02/runs-on-the-board/comment-page-1/#comment-118763 Brett Holman Sat, 07 Nov 2009 11:27:14 +0000 http://airminded.org/?p=2800#comment-118763 Thanks! JDK, it's gone through a couple of rounds of revision already, I might get a chance to look at proofs before it goes to the printers btu I'm not sure. As for the timescale, again I don't know, but if <a href="http://www.investigations.4-lom.com/publication-archive/" rel="nofollow">Gavin's experience</a> with the same journal is any guide it could come out as soon as April next year. Thanks! JDK, it's gone through a couple of rounds of revision already, I might get a chance to look at proofs before it goes to the printers btu I'm not sure. As for the timescale, again I don't know, but if Gavin's experience with the same journal is any guide it could come out as soon as April next year.

]]> By: Alan Allport http://airminded.org/2009/11/02/runs-on-the-board/comment-page-1/#comment-118429 Alan Allport Wed, 04 Nov 2009 19:02:01 +0000 http://airminded.org/?p=2800#comment-118429 Congratulations - that's great news. And now for a book ... Congratulations - that's great news. And now for a book ...

]]> By: Jakob http://airminded.org/2009/11/02/runs-on-the-board/comment-page-1/#comment-118300 Jakob Tue, 03 Nov 2009 15:16:10 +0000 http://airminded.org/?p=2800#comment-118300 Congrats! Congrats!

]]> By: JDK http://airminded.org/2009/11/02/runs-on-the-board/comment-page-1/#comment-118223 JDK Tue, 03 Nov 2009 00:45:42 +0000 http://airminded.org/?p=2800#comment-118223 Congratulations! That's great news. Can you get a badge that says 'Will be published this decade'? ;D More seriously, what's the revision process / timescale on this? Cheers Congratulations! That's great news.

Can you get a badge that says 'Will be published this decade'? ;D

More seriously, what's the revision process / timescale on this?

Cheers

]]> By: Erik Lund http://airminded.org/2009/11/02/runs-on-the-board/comment-page-1/#comment-118183 Erik Lund Mon, 02 Nov 2009 18:33:55 +0000 http://airminded.org/?p=2800#comment-118183 Rush, dude. Rush, dude.

]]> By: Chris Williams http://airminded.org/2009/11/02/runs-on-the-board/comment-page-1/#comment-118171 Chris Williams Mon, 02 Nov 2009 16:29:13 +0000 http://airminded.org/?p=2800#comment-118171 Beaut. Beaut.

]]> By: Gavin http://airminded.org/2009/11/02/runs-on-the-board/comment-page-1/#comment-118149 Gavin Mon, 02 Nov 2009 12:55:20 +0000 http://airminded.org/?p=2800#comment-118149 Fantastic! Welcome to the history bloggers who have been published in War In History club. :) Fantastic! Welcome to the history bloggers who have been published in War In History club. :)

]]> By: Ross Mahoney http://airminded.org/2009/11/02/runs-on-the-board/comment-page-1/#comment-118146 Ross Mahoney Mon, 02 Nov 2009 12:48:19 +0000 http://airminded.org/?p=2800#comment-118146 Congrats Brett. I will download and have a read. The lead in time for these things take so long. The paper I delivered last year at a conference will not be published until next year. Academia moves so slow... Ross Congrats Brett. I will download and have a read. The lead in time for these things take so long. The paper I delivered last year at a conference will not be published until next year. Academia moves so slow...

Ross

]]>