<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Holiday reading</title>
	<atom:link href="http://airminded.org/2008/12/19/holiday-reading/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://airminded.org/2008/12/19/holiday-reading/</link>
	<description>Airpower and British society, 1908-1941</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 13:50:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Brett Holman</title>
		<link>http://airminded.org/2008/12/19/holiday-reading/comment-page-1/#comment-94408</link>
		<dc:creator>Brett Holman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 12:45:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://airminded.org/?p=1094#comment-94408</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s the one called &#039;Achieving Air Ascendancy&#039;. Thanks for the offer -- I can ILL it though, I just haven&#039;t gotten around to it yet! I probably should do that soon ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s the one called &#8216;Achieving Air Ascendancy&#8217;. Thanks for the offer &#8212; I can ILL it though, I just haven&#8217;t gotten around to it yet! I probably should do that soon &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ross Mahoney</title>
		<link>http://airminded.org/2008/12/19/holiday-reading/comment-page-1/#comment-94321</link>
		<dc:creator>Ross Mahoney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 20:32:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://airminded.org/?p=1094#comment-94321</guid>
		<description>Cheers Brett. I suspected Ferris but thought I would check. I&#039;m sure I have got that one somewhere too. Which haven&#039;t you got? Would you like a photocopy?

Ross</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cheers Brett. I suspected Ferris but thought I would check. I&#8217;m sure I have got that one somewhere too. Which haven&#8217;t you got? Would you like a photocopy?</p>
<p>Ross</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brett Holman</title>
		<link>http://airminded.org/2008/12/19/holiday-reading/comment-page-1/#comment-93862</link>
		<dc:creator>Brett Holman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 14:05:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://airminded.org/?p=1094#comment-93862</guid>
		<description>My go-to source for HDAF is John Ferris, &#039;Fighter defence before Fighter Command: the rise of strategic air defence in Great Britain, 1917-1934&#039;, &lt;em&gt;Journal of Military History&lt;/em&gt; 63 (1999): 845-84. (I see you&#039;ve got a later reference by Ferris for that bit, but unfortunately I haven&#039;t read it!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My go-to source for HDAF is John Ferris, &#8216;Fighter defence before Fighter Command: the rise of strategic air defence in Great Britain, 1917-1934&#8242;, <em>Journal of Military History</em> 63 (1999): 845-84. (I see you&#8217;ve got a later reference by Ferris for that bit, but unfortunately I haven&#8217;t read it!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ross Mahoney</title>
		<link>http://airminded.org/2008/12/19/holiday-reading/comment-page-1/#comment-93725</link>
		<dc:creator>Ross Mahoney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 16:36:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://airminded.org/?p=1094#comment-93725</guid>
		<description>Brett - Cheers for comments. I agree with your points abou the conception of HDAF and you are quite right. What is your source for that? I may pop it in as a footnote. I am glad that people are slowly, and it is actually quite slow, moving away from the idea that the RAF spent all its time thinking about bombing. Actually both CD22 and AP1300 spend a hugh amount of time discussing the problems of co-operation in other spheres of operations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brett &#8211; Cheers for comments. I agree with your points abou the conception of HDAF and you are quite right. What is your source for that? I may pop it in as a footnote. I am glad that people are slowly, and it is actually quite slow, moving away from the idea that the RAF spent all its time thinking about bombing. Actually both CD22 and AP1300 spend a hugh amount of time discussing the problems of co-operation in other spheres of operations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
