<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wednesday, 5 October 1938</title>
	<atom:link href="http://airminded.org/2008/10/05/wednesday-5-october-1938/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://airminded.org/2008/10/05/wednesday-5-october-1938/</link>
	<description>Airpower and British society, 1908-1941</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 08:36:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Brett Holman</title>
		<link>http://airminded.org/2008/10/05/wednesday-5-october-1938/comment-page-1/#comment-87415</link>
		<dc:creator>Brett Holman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 04:49:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://airminded.org/?p=892#comment-87415</guid>
		<description>Wasn&#039;t just the French who were saying that. In 1934, the Defence Requirements Committee suggested beefing up the Army so that it could prevent the Low Countries from being used to bomb Britain, and in turncould be used as a forward base for bombing Germany.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wasn&#8217;t just the French who were saying that. In 1934, the Defence Requirements Committee suggested beefing up the Army so that it could prevent the Low Countries from being used to bomb Britain, and in turncould be used as a forward base for bombing Germany.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erik Lund</title>
		<link>http://airminded.org/2008/10/05/wednesday-5-october-1938/comment-page-1/#comment-87224</link>
		<dc:creator>Erik Lund</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 16:09:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://airminded.org/?p=892#comment-87224</guid>
		<description>Oh, there was plenty of prospect of navigation aids in 1939. While the visionaries were mostly talking about improving dead-reckoning by automating it (which came too), airline work on &quot;radio ranges&quot; and landing aids was of long standing, and any bomber could ask for a radio fix, anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, there was plenty of prospect of navigation aids in 1939. While the visionaries were mostly talking about improving dead-reckoning by automating it (which came too), airline work on &#8220;radio ranges&#8221; and landing aids was of long standing, and any bomber could ask for a radio fix, anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Williams</title>
		<link>http://airminded.org/2008/10/05/wednesday-5-october-1938/comment-page-1/#comment-87213</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Williams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 11:28:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://airminded.org/?p=892#comment-87213</guid>
		<description>In 1939/40, that _was_ the place to do it. Attacking SE England from France and the Low Countries is _vastly_ easier than doing so from Germany, as Bomber Command discovered in 1939-42 when it tried it in the opposite direction. One example - the bomber offensive got a lot more powerful in late 1944 simply because Gee transmitters moved east with the Allies. 

Even if there&#039;s no prospect or knowledge of triogonometric navigation aids, distance means early warning, a well-known threat axis, and the arrival of an enemy who are already tired and low on fuel. And unescorted. Compare Adlertag and Wilhelmshavn, for example.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In 1939/40, that _was_ the place to do it. Attacking SE England from France and the Low Countries is _vastly_ easier than doing so from Germany, as Bomber Command discovered in 1939-42 when it tried it in the opposite direction. One example &#8211; the bomber offensive got a lot more powerful in late 1944 simply because Gee transmitters moved east with the Allies. </p>
<p>Even if there&#8217;s no prospect or knowledge of triogonometric navigation aids, distance means early warning, a well-known threat axis, and the arrival of an enemy who are already tired and low on fuel. And unescorted. Compare Adlertag and Wilhelmshavn, for example.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erik Lund</title>
		<link>http://airminded.org/2008/10/05/wednesday-5-october-1938/comment-page-1/#comment-87187</link>
		<dc:creator>Erik Lund</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 23:53:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://airminded.org/?p=892#comment-87187</guid>
		<description>You&#039;d be surprised at just how single-minded French policy makers are about the phrase &quot;British continental commitment.&quot; The place to defend Britain from enemy aeroplanes is on the battlefields of Belgium and Holland!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;d be surprised at just how single-minded French policy makers are about the phrase &#8220;British continental commitment.&#8221; The place to defend Britain from enemy aeroplanes is on the battlefields of Belgium and Holland!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brett Holman</title>
		<link>http://airminded.org/2008/10/05/wednesday-5-october-1938/comment-page-1/#comment-87148</link>
		<dc:creator>Brett Holman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 13:11:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://airminded.org/?p=892#comment-87148</guid>
		<description>Well, it was customary in the British press to use the relevant honorific: Signor Mussolini, Herr Hitler, M. Daladier, Mr. Chamberlain. Mussolini and Hitler were important world leaders and not yet enemies, so it&#039;s not so surprising really.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, it was customary in the British press to use the relevant honorific: Signor Mussolini, Herr Hitler, M. Daladier, Mr. Chamberlain. Mussolini and Hitler were important world leaders and not yet enemies, so it&#8217;s not so surprising really.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CK</title>
		<link>http://airminded.org/2008/10/05/wednesday-5-october-1938/comment-page-1/#comment-87001</link>
		<dc:creator>CK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 12:18:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://airminded.org/?p=892#comment-87001</guid>
		<description>...and blow me down if that sidebar doesn&#039;t deserve comment. Good to see everybody clearing the deck.

&quot;Signor&quot; Mussolini WTF?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;and blow me down if that sidebar doesn&#8217;t deserve comment. Good to see everybody clearing the deck.</p>
<p>&#8220;Signor&#8221; Mussolini WTF?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CK</title>
		<link>http://airminded.org/2008/10/05/wednesday-5-october-1938/comment-page-1/#comment-86998</link>
		<dc:creator>CK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 12:12:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://airminded.org/?p=892#comment-86998</guid>
		<description>At some point, Brett, you&#039;re going to have to weave &quot;It was the last summer before the war...&quot; into a post. 

But that&#039;s still six months away.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At some point, Brett, you&#8217;re going to have to weave &#8220;It was the last summer before the war&#8230;&#8221; into a post. </p>
<p>But that&#8217;s still six months away.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brett Holman</title>
		<link>http://airminded.org/2008/10/05/wednesday-5-october-1938/comment-page-1/#comment-86899</link>
		<dc:creator>Brett Holman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 16:16:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://airminded.org/?p=892#comment-86899</guid>
		<description>Could be wrong, but I don&#039;t think there&#039;s much call for tanks until 1939, after the next Czech crisis. (Which I won&#039;t be post-blogging!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could be wrong, but I don&#8217;t think there&#8217;s much call for tanks until 1939, after the next Czech crisis. (Which I won&#8217;t be post-blogging!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erik Lund</title>
		<link>http://airminded.org/2008/10/05/wednesday-5-october-1938/comment-page-1/#comment-86889</link>
		<dc:creator>Erik Lund</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 15:01:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://airminded.org/?p=892#comment-86889</guid>
		<description>If the Territorials go on AA guns, who is going to drive all of Lord Nuffield&#039;s new tanks?
Hmm, maybe the French won&#039;t mind fighting the Germans one-on-one if Liverpool has adequate AAA. 
Or, well, there&#039;s national service.
But that would be crazy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the Territorials go on AA guns, who is going to drive all of Lord Nuffield&#8217;s new tanks?<br />
Hmm, maybe the French won&#8217;t mind fighting the Germans one-on-one if Liverpool has adequate AAA.<br />
Or, well, there&#8217;s national service.<br />
But that would be crazy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
