<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Not the state of the military historioblogosphere</title>
	<atom:link href="http://airminded.org/2008/09/25/not-the-state-of-the-military-historioblogosphere/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://airminded.org/2008/09/25/not-the-state-of-the-military-historioblogosphere/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=not-the-state-of-the-military-historioblogosphere</link>
	<description>Airpower and British society, 1908-1941</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 16:07:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brett Holman</title>
		<link>http://airminded.org/2008/09/25/not-the-state-of-the-military-historioblogosphere/comment-page-1/#comment-85788</link>
		<dc:creator>Brett Holman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 13:13:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://airminded.org/?p=735#comment-85788</guid>
		<description>Yes, they&#039;ve definitely taken to blogging, there&#039;s clearly a good degree of institutional support for it at the AWM. But I&#039;ve noticed the relative lack of comments too. The fact that registration is required probably puts people off, and I wish they&#039;d reconsider their decision not to engage with the rest of the historioblogosphere. It would help build traffic for them, among other things.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, they've definitely taken to blogging, there's clearly a good degree of institutional support for it at the AWM. But I've noticed the relative lack of comments too. The fact that registration is required probably puts people off, and I wish they'd reconsider their decision not to engage with the rest of the historioblogosphere. It would help build traffic for them, among other things.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Meade</title>
		<link>http://airminded.org/2008/09/25/not-the-state-of-the-military-historioblogosphere/comment-page-1/#comment-85773</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Meade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 10:27:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://airminded.org/?p=735#comment-85773</guid>
		<description>Positively, the Australian War Memorial &quot;group&quot; blog seems to be going well - there are some good and very informative posts there.

It is also given precedence on the AWM homepage, being the first listed link in the left sidebar.

I&#039;d love to know their stats, particular if they got a lift with that link position.  They&#039;re not getting many comments on the blog though, considering the AWM is Canberra&#039;s no. 1 tourist attraction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Positively, the Australian War Memorial "group" blog seems to be going well - there are some good and very informative posts there.</p>
<p>It is also given precedence on the AWM homepage, being the first listed link in the left sidebar.</p>
<p>I'd love to know their stats, particular if they got a lift with that link position.  They're not getting many comments on the blog though, considering the AWM is Canberra's no. 1 tourist attraction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

