<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rome 2b</title>
	<atom:link href="http://airminded.org/2008/04/24/rome-2b/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://airminded.org/2008/04/24/rome-2b/</link>
	<description>Airpower and British society, 1908-1941</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 15:05:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Katie</title>
		<link>http://airminded.org/2008/04/24/rome-2b/comment-page-1/#comment-121563</link>
		<dc:creator>Katie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 20:57:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://airminded.org/2008/04/24/rome-2b/#comment-121563</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll look for it!  It&#039;s a shame it always comes down to money, but at least you&#039;re famous now :).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll look for it!  It&#8217;s a shame it always comes down to money, but at least you&#8217;re famous now :).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brett Holman</title>
		<link>http://airminded.org/2008/04/24/rome-2b/comment-page-1/#comment-120712</link>
		<dc:creator>Brett Holman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 07:41:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://airminded.org/2008/04/24/rome-2b/#comment-120712</guid>
		<description>Thanks for that information, Katie! I did hope some classicist would come along and fill me in :)

Rome is an easy city to photograph, so it&#039;s not much credit to me. But a pic I took of the Aurelian column is going to appear in a book published by OUP, which pleases my ego, I have to say! (I&#039;m sure the fact that I didn&#039;t charge anything for it helped too ...)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for that information, Katie! I did hope some classicist would come along and fill me in :)</p>
<p>Rome is an easy city to photograph, so it&#8217;s not much credit to me. But a pic I took of the Aurelian column is going to appear in a book published by OUP, which pleases my ego, I have to say! (I&#8217;m sure the fact that I didn&#8217;t charge anything for it helped too &#8230;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Katie</title>
		<link>http://airminded.org/2008/04/24/rome-2b/comment-page-1/#comment-120588</link>
		<dc:creator>Katie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 15:02:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://airminded.org/2008/04/24/rome-2b/#comment-120588</guid>
		<description>In regards to the Flavian matron statue:  This would have been a funerary offering for the deceased woman, whose portrait serves as the face for this statue.  In ancient Rome, it was customary for middle class families (and even freedmen) to erect such statues in commemoration of their wives and mothers.  Her middle-aged, less-than-perfect face suggests that she was a good wife and mother, who took raising her children and managing her household seriously.  The idealized body, however, is a way of alluding to her ability to bear many healthy children, and her ability to fulfill other wifely duties.  These would have been placed within tombs that ran along places like the Appian Way, and would probably have only been seen by the family of the deceased.  She is quite interesting, though!  

Your photos are fabulous and I really appreciated looking at them.  Also, thank you for giving me an excuse to finally use my degrees for good; I majored in art history and classics as an undergrad, specializing in Roman sculpture.  Thanks again for the images!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In regards to the Flavian matron statue:  This would have been a funerary offering for the deceased woman, whose portrait serves as the face for this statue.  In ancient Rome, it was customary for middle class families (and even freedmen) to erect such statues in commemoration of their wives and mothers.  Her middle-aged, less-than-perfect face suggests that she was a good wife and mother, who took raising her children and managing her household seriously.  The idealized body, however, is a way of alluding to her ability to bear many healthy children, and her ability to fulfill other wifely duties.  These would have been placed within tombs that ran along places like the Appian Way, and would probably have only been seen by the family of the deceased.  She is quite interesting, though!  </p>
<p>Your photos are fabulous and I really appreciated looking at them.  Also, thank you for giving me an excuse to finally use my degrees for good; I majored in art history and classics as an undergrad, specializing in Roman sculpture.  Thanks again for the images!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
