<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: H. G. Wells</title>
	<atom:link href="http://airminded.org/2007/01/15/h-g-wells/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://airminded.org/2007/01/15/h-g-wells/</link>
	<description>Airpower and British society, 1908-1941</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 12:53:59 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Brett Holman</title>
		<link>http://airminded.org/2007/01/15/h-g-wells/#comment-34945</link>
		<dc:creator>Brett Holman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 03:19:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://airminded.org/2007/01/15/h-g-wells/#comment-34945</guid>
		<description>There was definitely greater deference to the privacy of public figures, and you're right that there weren't so many telephones around ... But Marwick (in &lt;em&gt;A History of the Modern British Isles, 1914-1999&lt;/em&gt;) gives figures for the number of private phone line rentals: in 1937 these just exceeded a million for the first time. I think 10 million, in round figures, is close enough for the number of British househoulds? So, all else being equal, around 1 in every 10 British nutters had access to a phone at this time :) There were also 1500 public telephone kiosks in London and 12000 nationwide (according to &lt;a href="http://elettra.co.uk/phonebox/variants.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;) so there was ample opportunity for any nutter who wanted to harangue HG (and who could afford the cost of a call) to do so. So I'd say it had more to do with social conventions.

The &lt;a href="http://airminded.org/biographies/h-g-wells/" rel="nofollow"&gt;&lt;em&gt;Who's Who&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt; entry was clearly up-to-date as of early 1937 (or maybe late 1936): it doesn't list any of the books published in 1937 (including &lt;em&gt;Star Begotten&lt;/em&gt; one of his last SF novels), but it does list two films for 1937 which were never actually made as far as I know (&lt;em&gt;The Food of the Gods&lt;/em&gt; and &lt;em&gt;The New Faust&lt;/em&gt;). So anyway, it was a long time after &lt;em&gt;An Outline of History&lt;/em&gt; was published (1920).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There was definitely greater deference to the privacy of public figures, and you&#8217;re right that there weren&#8217;t so many telephones around &#8230; But Marwick (in <em>A History of the Modern British Isles, 1914-1999</em>) gives figures for the number of private phone line rentals: in 1937 these just exceeded a million for the first time. I think 10 million, in round figures, is close enough for the number of British househoulds? So, all else being equal, around 1 in every 10 British nutters had access to a phone at this time :) There were also 1500 public telephone kiosks in London and 12000 nationwide (according to <a href="http://elettra.co.uk/phonebox/variants.html" rel="nofollow">here</a>) so there was ample opportunity for any nutter who wanted to harangue HG (and who could afford the cost of a call) to do so. So I&#8217;d say it had more to do with social conventions.</p>
<p>The <a href="http://airminded.org/biographies/h-g-wells/" rel="nofollow"><em>Who&#8217;s Who</em></a> entry was clearly up-to-date as of early 1937 (or maybe late 1936): it doesn&#8217;t list any of the books published in 1937 (including <em>Star Begotten</em> one of his last SF novels), but it does list two films for 1937 which were never actually made as far as I know (<em>The Food of the Gods</em> and <em>The New Faust</em>). So anyway, it was a long time after <em>An Outline of History</em> was published (1920).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://airminded.org/2007/01/15/h-g-wells/#comment-34819</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2007 19:30:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://airminded.org/2007/01/15/h-g-wells/#comment-34819</guid>
		<description>But then, very few British people had a phone for a long time - it was one of the consumer goods which lagged behind in terms of uptake into the late 1960s I think. Given a different cultural template, I suspect that not many of the 'celebrities' who gave out their phone numbers got rung up by nutters. You don't say when Wells composed/revised the WW entry to which you refer. Would that account for the explanation of the Outline of History?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But then, very few British people had a phone for a long time - it was one of the consumer goods which lagged behind in terms of uptake into the late 1960s I think. Given a different cultural template, I suspect that not many of the &#8216;celebrities&#8217; who gave out their phone numbers got rung up by nutters. You don&#8217;t say when Wells composed/revised the WW entry to which you refer. Would that account for the explanation of the Outline of History?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brett Holman</title>
		<link>http://airminded.org/2007/01/15/h-g-wells/#comment-34597</link>
		<dc:creator>Brett Holman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2007 05:37:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://airminded.org/2007/01/15/h-g-wells/#comment-34597</guid>
		<description>Sounds like what he wanted was a Blogger account!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds like what he wanted was a Blogger account!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Allport</title>
		<link>http://airminded.org/2007/01/15/h-g-wells/#comment-34483</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Allport</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2007 14:10:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://airminded.org/2007/01/15/h-g-wells/#comment-34483</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;I find it amusing that such a world-famous figure would list his telephone number (Paddington 6204), not to mention his address (13 Hanover Terrace, Regents Park, N.W.1). Did he not get pestered by well-wishers, celebrity-seekers and out-and-out nutters? Maybe he had a secretary to answer the phone.&lt;/i&gt;

George Orwell gave out his address in &lt;i&gt;Partisan Review&lt;/i&gt; and actually encouraged its readers to write to him!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>I find it amusing that such a world-famous figure would list his telephone number (Paddington 6204), not to mention his address (13 Hanover Terrace, Regents Park, N.W.1). Did he not get pestered by well-wishers, celebrity-seekers and out-and-out nutters? Maybe he had a secretary to answer the phone.</i></p>
<p>George Orwell gave out his address in <i>Partisan Review</i> and actually encouraged its readers to write to him!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
