<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The SLV</title>
	<atom:link href="http://airminded.org/2006/04/17/the-slv/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://airminded.org/2006/04/17/the-slv/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=the-slv</link>
	<description>Airpower and British society, 1908-1941</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 10:08:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Airminded &#183; S 330.15 B73</title>
		<link>http://airminded.org/2006/04/17/the-slv/comment-page-1/#comment-86472</link>
		<dc:creator>Airminded &#183; S 330.15 B73</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 06:55:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://airminded.org/2006/04/17/the-slv/#comment-86472</guid>
		<description>[...] call slip (i.e. the bit of paper you fill in to request that a book be retrieved for you) from the SLV. I found it inside Property or Peace? by H. N. Brailsford, a socialist journalist. The book was [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] call slip (i.e. the bit of paper you fill in to request that a book be retrieved for you) from the SLV. I found it inside Property or Peace? by H. N. Brailsford, a socialist journalist. The book was [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Airminded &#183; Now pay attention</title>
		<link>http://airminded.org/2006/04/17/the-slv/comment-page-1/#comment-7957</link>
		<dc:creator>Airminded &#183; Now pay attention</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2006 12:23:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://airminded.org/2006/04/17/the-slv/#comment-7957</guid>
		<description>[...] This sticker is in the back of a book published in 1940, originally part of the collection of the Public Lending Library of Victoria (itself a part of the Public Library of Victoria, as the SLV was then known). I was struck particularly by no. 4. Were books considered possible vectors for infectious disease &#8212; TB, perhaps? (If so, then obviously the best idea would be to get those books back into circulation as soon as possible.) Or maybe the Chief Librarian was worried that if everyone in the house was sick, their library books wouldn&#8217;t be returned on time, even despite the THREEPENCE fine for every three days or fraction thereof that they were overdue. (I can just imagine the Librarian glaring at the hapless late returner and intoning: &#8220;That will be THRUP. PENCE.&#8221;) I also like the way in which books are treated like people: they are not to be &#8220;detained&#8221; or &#8220;injured&#8221; (as a bibliophile, I&#8217;m always in danger of the former habit but completely agree with their firm stance on the latter). But I&#8217;m dying to know what Lending Library Rule 6 was. If there any former patrons still around they could probably tell me &#8212; given the familarity they were expected to have with the Lending Library Rules it&#8217;s probably burned into their minds. And can you imagine your embarrassment at waking up the day after moving house, and realising that you&#8217;ve neglected to notify the Librarian without delay? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This sticker is in the back of a book published in 1940, originally part of the collection of the Public Lending Library of Victoria (itself a part of the Public Library of Victoria, as the SLV was then known). I was struck particularly by no. 4. Were books considered possible vectors for infectious disease &#8212; TB, perhaps? (If so, then obviously the best idea would be to get those books back into circulation as soon as possible.) Or maybe the Chief Librarian was worried that if everyone in the house was sick, their library books wouldn&#8217;t be returned on time, even despite the THREEPENCE fine for every three days or fraction thereof that they were overdue. (I can just imagine the Librarian glaring at the hapless late returner and intoning: &#8220;That will be THRUP. PENCE.&#8221;) I also like the way in which books are treated like people: they are not to be &#8220;detained&#8221; or &#8220;injured&#8221; (as a bibliophile, I&#8217;m always in danger of the former habit but completely agree with their firm stance on the latter). But I&#8217;m dying to know what Lending Library Rule 6 was. If there any former patrons still around they could probably tell me &#8212; given the familarity they were expected to have with the Lending Library Rules it&#8217;s probably burned into their minds. And can you imagine your embarrassment at waking up the day after moving house, and realising that you&#8217;ve neglected to notify the Librarian without delay? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

