- A flying machine is an aeroplane (qv).
- A dirigible balloon (or just dirigible) is an airship (qv).
- An aeroplane is the wing of a flying machine (qv).
- Airship collectively describes both flying machines and dirigible balloons (qqv).
Get it? (Got it.) Good!
Seriously, I’m glad the meanings of these words were rationalised within a few years: what a head-ache it would be to have constantly qualify them all through my thesis!
Sources: R.P. Hearne, Aerial Warfare (London and New York: John Lane,
1909); Fred T. Jane, ed, All the World’s Air-ships (Flying Annual)
(London: Sampson Low, Marston & Co., 1909).

This work, unless otherwise expressly stated, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 License. Terms and conditions beyond the scope of this license may be available at airminded.org.
Possibly-related posts:
-
I think George Cayley used it to mean wing – I assume it’s from ‘plane surface’, and possibly ‘inclined plane’.
-
A quick browse through Gibbs-Smith suggests that Cayley talked about measuring the lift and drag on ‘inclined planes’, but doesn’t seem to use ‘aeroplane’ itself.
-
From “Early Flying Machine”, a Camden reprint (2003) of exerpts from “Engineering Wonders of the World”, (Nelson, c.1909)
“In the present article, the term flying machine is synonymous with aeroplane. “Aeroplane” is not a happy term in itself, because planes seldom form part of a flying machine, whereas the curved or cambered deck is always used, at least for the main sustaining surfaces”
“It was proved conclusively that (a) a true plane had not, area for area, so great a sustaining power as a slightly curved surface, convex on the upper side. Horatio Phillips, and subsequently Maxim demonstrated by elaborate tests that (b) an aeroplane (we here apply the term to a sustaining surface, not to a machine)……. was most efficient”Another interesting usage:- “Bleriot, Latham, and others have chosen the alternative of the monoplane, having a single deck subdivided into two wings, one on each side of a central “body”.”
-
Very interesting. Reading this made me think of riding in my parents’ car as a child, hand out the window “aero-planing” in the wind-blast. And of course the remarkable (true?) tale of the one-winged F-15.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=slLKmtIKccs

10 comments
Comments feed for this article
Trackback link: http://airminded.org/2006/01/29/an-extremely-brief-guide-to-early-aeronautical-terms-ca-1909/trackback/